Tripwire Interactive – The company that developed Red Orchestra, Killing Floor And Maneater, And also published Chivalry II, Zeno Clash and some other games. The day before is the president Tripwire John Gibson (John Gibson) spoke positively about the law against abortion in Texas and turned off the hornet’s nest – with condemnations not only from ordinary inhabitants, but also from business partners.
The essence of the law is as follows: now in Texas it is forbidden to have an abortion after the sixth week of pregnancy – it is believed that from this moment the fetus begins heartbeat (although the opinions of doctors diverge in this subject). In addition, Texas law allows private individuals to sue organizations that provide abortion services after the specified period.
The wording of the Decree became known a few months ago, and even then worried citizens carried out protest shares: for example, they stated that many women did not know about their pregnancy during the first six weeks. They tried to reject the law through the US Supreme Court, but it did not work out – he entered into force on September 1, giving rise to a new wave of discontent.
And against this background John Gibson Published on the personal page the next post:
I am proud that the US Supreme Court missed the Texas law on the ban on abortion of children who already have a heartbeat. I work in the entertainment industry and do not often touch on politics. Nevertheless, given how many loudly expressing colleagues are on the other side of this problem, I consider it important to declare myself as a game developer who protects the right to life.
It didn’t end in anything good. For example, like a statement Gibson Meet Kory Barlog (Cory Barlog), creator of the last God of War:
Position Gibson Other well -known personalities of the industry also criticized: for example, a former screenwriter Valve Even dumplings (Cheet Faliszek) and game designer GEARS of WAR Cliff Blazhinsky (Cliff bleszinski).
Then a heavier artillery connected: from the statement Gibson Distant Torn Banner Studios – Developers Chivalry II, Where Tripwire acts as a publisher.
We do not share the opinion that the President of Tripwire, the publisher of Chivalry II,. Our team does not share this point of view, it is not reflected in our games. This opinion is contrary to what we think about women’s rights.
Finally, the main blow – Shipwright Studios stated that she would no longer cooperate with Tripwire, While heading it Gibson. This studio previously helped Tripwire with production Chivalry II And Maneater.
Although your political opinion belongs only to you, at the moment when you make it part of the public discourse, you get into the situation of everyone who works for you and with you. We worked closely with talented developers Tripwire and your partners over the past three years.
We know that in such situations it is difficult for employees to speak out or do something-it can be uncomfortable to voice their opinion.
This is regrettable, but we believe that we will harm yourself, your employees, your partners and the industry as a whole, if we continue to allow this behavior without comment.
Shipwright It began with the idea that it is time not only to speak, but also to act. We cannot continue cooperation with a clear conscience with a clear conscience Tripwire under her current guidance. From this moment we begin to cancel our current contracts [with Tripwire].
Apparently, Gibson I have not yet spoke about the current situation.
September 6, 2021 a serious hare solves problems with a mechanical fist – trailer to launch f.I.S.T.: Forged in Shadow Torch
September 6, 2021 "Atom RPG: Trudograd" leaves early access on September 13
Chivalry II
The best comments
Although your political opinion belongs only to you, at the moment when you make it part of the public discourse, you get into the situation of everyone who works for you and with you.
Everyone expressing his opinion should remember this.
You have the right to any opinion.
And any person has the right to crap you for this opinion, if you already decided to express it publicly.
The keyword https://noaccount-casinos.co.uk/review/palm-casino/ is publicly.
What is happening in your pants is personally your business as long as you have a width. This applies to your opinion, thoughts, and other things. It is yours personally while you keep it with you. You start to speak to the public – you yourself make it public. With all the ensuing.
Well, as for the statement itself, it is idiotic. Where does the fetal heartbeat are generally? How it is connected with the right of a woman not to give birth?
When the entire civilized world has long realized that the ban on abortion leads to an increase in the brokeners and poverty, some brainless continue to yell “fruit abortion – murder!111 "
Somehow everyone abruptly went too far, in my opinion.
Because he spoke like a nerd. This can be a banal responsibility before the child, so that he does not grow an orphan or not grow in a family where he does not receive love. Women really may not feel any changes. However, to give birth, simply because a person is “alive” into a world where nobody needs a baby more disgusting than to interrupt the life of the fetus.
And so there are enough people who grew up without love (not to be confused with dolls-toys-toys of parents) .
I am the parent myself. I know what I say. My wife had to have an abortion after the first -born was in the family. Simply because we are not ready for housing for one of the peanut. We do not want a conflict of attention and territory in children. And I would be extremely unhappy if such a law prevented our choice.
What leads to, before the abortion, a psychologist is supposed to go through and several specialists. So the psychologist has a motivation to preserve the child: “Well, you will not feed anything? " -" This is a sin! "," They will play with each other ". And this is even after the explanation that we came to the decision, but we want to be prepared, we were parrying, they say “some people cope with five. Why can’t you handle two ".
The position that children should be stamped into oblivion with children’s mortality, but there are still conservative individuals ready for stamping, and at the same time do not think about children at all.
That is why I negatively relate to the statement of the head of Tripvar, and to your recent remark about some “poor, white, heterosexual”. Although the topic is not even about them.
Yeah, this is the case. The girl was raped and she did not have time to take measures during these six weeks? Let it go to give birth. Childbirth can be dangerous for the health of the girl herself and it turned out only in the second month? Let it go to give birth. Great law, just awesome, reliable, like a Swiss watch! /s
Why does the law protect less living people than an unbroken set of cells? Why are arguments from the category “Bible forbids abortion” are considered at the Legislative Assembly of a secular state? Why this law is adopted mainly by men, and not women?
The answer is not given to all these questions. Even some other Republicans condemn the decision of the Texas Senate, because this is really a step towards the "story of the maid". And if a person says that he is glad that this decision is made, then let him take a batch of shit from those who do not share this opinion. Let him continue to cooperate with Texas groups, which also support this law. There, there, next door, the creator of Five Night’s at Freddy carries a similar agend.
Dude has the right to his opinion. And the rest of the people have the right not to keep any contacts with him because of his opinion.
Well, this is Texas Aka one of the most religious and conservative states. Regarding the infringement of someone’s rights, America is sometimes ahead of Russia.
They cannot control their sex life, and want to dispose of someone else’s lives?
It is better, of course, to force to engage in such a responsible thing as raising a child, even if a woman herself does not want it. This is much better (no).
Analogy for clear:
You have a friend, and unexpectedly he becomes a lover of Campf Mine and quotes him to the right and left. Of course, adequate people do not want to deal with him. But this is not a task, you are his friend and a chain of thinking appears: “He is friends with an inadequate, then his inadequacy is satisfied. Maybe he himself is inadequate and also reads Main Campf?". People will want to communicate with you? No, they will not want just because you communicate with that person. This is called "optics".
Is support for the ban on abortion to the support of Adolf Hitler equal? No, not equal, Hitler was a hundred times worse, but the essence of the concept of "optics" does not change. You communicate with a person who is condemned by the liberal community (and most of the developers of games are liberals, there are direct reigning), then you share his views. Absurd? No, I wouldn’t say. "It is not honest that I must be responsible for my friend’s thoughts"? Perhaps yes, dishonest, but it is only logical, and it is characteristic of all people.
"Kill before birth" is strong.
That is exactly what Shivarli’s outfits 2 and others did, they just stopped being “friend” of the head of Tripwire
Why should I cancel for an opinion
If I speak on TV with the opinion that I need to kill all the redheads, and I will collect like -minded people around me, it will be normal?
Or the fact that the "age of consent" should be small?
Or the way one foreign politicians said for a long time that women in narrow jeans cannot be accepted about rape?
Because opinion is anti -human, extremist, etc.
This is one of these.
But about double standards of tolerance (you are hinting at it, yes?) I see no reason to discuss. Everything is clear with them.
You have a friend, and unexpectedly he becomes a lover of Campf Mine and quotes him to the right and left. Of course, adequate people do not want to deal with him. But here is not a task, you are his friend
Let’s be more analogy. Not a friend, but a colleague. Friends are connected by common interests-therefore, in this case, think that you share interest in Main Kampf of a friend-Nazi, to some extent justified. If we are talking about colleagues at work, then they are connected only by the work itself, and about their personal life and personal worldview you may not know at all. Unless, if, as they said here in some comment, the personnel department in the company is engaged in "check for well-time".
Secondly, Nazi ideology is prohibited by law. Pro-Life position is not prohibited, judging by the adopted law, even vice versa.
The fact that employees work in the company of a person who fell into disgrace is already their own solution and their problems. If they depend on a person who cannot filter their public performances – these are their problems and their responsibility. They put themselves in this position, not someone else. They can change the work, they can stay. They are free in their choice of the future path, no one will haunt them for anything, even if they remain.
The fact that they have made themselves dependent on another – does not give any protection to this other.
Chuvachello, you are engaged in the substitution of concepts, and on an uncultural scale: on your logic, the employee must first interrogate with the addiction of HRA about what political preferences of all major representatives of the company, whose social networks are observed by the people? And changing work is like changing gloves, just as simple and painless?
Try to include what is splashing in the cranium, before writing a nonsense. For, according to your “logic”, all the Germans were Nazis without exception, for they put themselves in a dependent position from the head of state, which promoted this idea. And they themselves are to blame for this, they would like to dump, yes, yes. An example, of course, is hyperbolized, but absolutely corresponding to your understanding of the world.
Because for the slop on the other side in social networks they just ban. Freedom of speech about which so much has written so much now works only one way.
Well, why sexist? Nowhere is it said that abortion is forbidden only to women.
Americans in California and New York and Texas outback are very different.
Hmm, well, technically learned. Children die in millions when they are wiped with a napkin.)
Be kind, explain why this law is liberal. I’m interested.
Learned, a vasectomy procedure is called.
Stopgame published the news about the consequences of the statement of the head of Tripwire in defense of abortion. After the publication of this news in the comments, a last nightmare began.
